High Courts

“Supplying products with altered local content is a breach of contract” Bombay High Court upholds BPCL order barring Mukand Poly Products from trading.   The current petition, was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, contested the legality of an order issued by Respondent 1, BPCL, on 08/12/2023, which prohibited business dealings with petitioner Mukand Poly Products and its affiliated agencies. Additionally, the order prohibited petitioner […]

“Supplying products with altered local content is a breach of contract” Bombay High Court upholds BPCL order barring Mukand Poly Products from trading.   The current petition, was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, contested the legality of an order issued by Respondent 1, BPCL, on 08/12/2023, which prohibited business dealings with petitioner Mukand Poly Products and its affiliated agencies. Additionally, the order prohibited petitioner

Kerala HC: 'Prostitute' Remark Must Be Heard to Be Offence u/s. 509 of IPC    The Kerala High Court's judgement on September 30, 2024, delivered by Justice A. Badharudeen, addresses a crucial aspect of the legal framework concerning offences against the modesty of women under Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).  The case

Kerala HC: 'Prostitute' Remark Must Be Heard to Be Offence u/s. 509 of IPC    The Kerala High Court's judgement on September 30, 2024, delivered by Justice A. Badharudeen, addresses a crucial aspect of the legal framework concerning offences against the modesty of women under Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).  The case

Calling out a petitioner’s reliance on procedural aspects of Civil procedure Code (CPC), 1908, as ‘misplaced’, Justice Sanjeev Narula  of  Delhi High Court in his  order dated 25.09.2024, highlighted that the Consumer Protection  (CP) Act,  granted the State Consumer Disputed Redressal Commission(SCDRC), the power to act with the authority of a Judicial Magistrate, First Class, 

Calling out a petitioner’s reliance on procedural aspects of Civil procedure Code (CPC), 1908, as ‘misplaced’, Justice Sanjeev Narula  of  Delhi High Court in his  order dated 25.09.2024, highlighted that the Consumer Protection  (CP) Act,  granted the State Consumer Disputed Redressal Commission(SCDRC), the power to act with the authority of a Judicial Magistrate, First Class, 

On 20th Sept 2024, the Bombay High Court bench of Justice Arif S. Doctor  having  deliberated on a matter pronounced an  order  in a case of a  petitioner  seeking urgent ad interim relief against Defendant No.3,  Sherry Singh,  accused of violating Agreement with Mrs. India Pageant Over Participation in Other Competitions. Facts of the instant

On 20th Sept 2024, the Bombay High Court bench of Justice Arif S. Doctor  having  deliberated on a matter pronounced an  order  in a case of a  petitioner  seeking urgent ad interim relief against Defendant No.3,  Sherry Singh,  accused of violating Agreement with Mrs. India Pageant Over Participation in Other Competitions. Facts of the instant

The Delhi High Court has sought response from Delhi Police on seeking permission to permit activist Sonam Wangchuk and others from Ladakh to hold peaceful protests demanding Sixth Schedule status for Ladakh and raising environmental awareness at Jantar Mantar. The Division Bench comprising Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Amit Sharma directed the authorities to

The Rahul Gandhi Citizenship Controversy: Subramanian Swamy’s Legal Challenge On October 9, 2024, the Delhi High Court Bench composed of Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela granted BJP leader Subramanian Swamy additional time to file a copy of a petition pending before the Allahabad High Court concerning the issue of Congress leader Rahul