Supreme Court

In a Civil Appeal before the Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, set aside the Madhya Pradesh High Court's judgment, which had directed the Indore Vikas Praadhikaran (IDA) to allot land to Shri Humad Jain Samaj Trust (Trust), the highest bidder in a public auction. The Supreme Court […]

The Supreme Court raised concerns about the increasing tendency of bureaucratic harassment against female elected officials while providing relief to a woman Sarpanch in Chhattisgarh against her removal from office. “It is disheartening that despite our nation's aspirations to become an economic powerhouse, these incidents of discrimination against women in governance continue unabated, bearing striking

Purpose Of Religious Conversion Can’t Be To Derive Benefit Of Reservation, Defeats The Social Ethos Of The Policy Of Reservation: Supreme Court The Supreme Court has upheld the decision of the Madras High Court and has dismissed an appeal of a woman who although was born Christian claimed to be a Hindu to avail the

On November 25, 2024, the Supreme Court of India division bench comprising CJI Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar dismissed Writ Petitions (Civil) Nos. 645 of 2020 and 1467 of 2020, which challenged the inclusion of the words ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ in the Preamble to the Constitution through the 42nd Amendment. The petitions raised arguments

The Supreme Court of India recently dealt with a significant issue concerning judicial criticism. The appeal arose from adverse remarks made by the Delhi High Court against an Additional District and Sessions Judge (ASJ) in a judgment. The judgement delivered by Justices Abhay S. Oka, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, and Augustine George Masih addressed the concerns raised

The Supreme Court bench of Justice Bela Trivedi and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma granted anticipatory bail to Malayalam actor Siddique, who was accused of rape and criminal intimidation. The complaint was lodged eight years after the incident, which allegedly occurred in 2016. The court considered the delay in filing the complaint and the complainant's failure to

Calculation of royalties is a policy issue, but the court must not overlook any apparent discrepancies in the calculation method: Supreme Court The three-judge bench, consisting of former Chief Justice of India, Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice J.B. Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj Misra, considered the writ petition contesting the validity of Explanation to Rule 38 of

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, during a hearing before the Supreme Court on 18/11/2024, suggested that the process of conferring senior advocate designations under Section 16 of the Advocates Act, 1961, requires a re-evaluation. This observation was made before a bench comprising Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih. The case brought attention to

Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna recused himself today, 18/11/2024, from hearing a contempt case involving the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) over allegations of unauthorised felling of trees in the ecologically sensitive Delhi Ridge Forest. The CJI cited a recent interaction with Delhi’s Lieutenant Governor (LG), VK Saxena, at a National Legal Services Authority

The Supreme Court ruled that unilateral arbitrator appointment clauses violate impartiality, equal treatment, and Article 14 of the Constitution. Justice Chandrachud emphasized fair arbitration processes, while Justice Roy upheld eligible unilateral appointments, and Justice Narasimha stressed public policy compliance. Future arbitrator appointments must align with these principles. The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015, was