Supreme Court

 On 17th October,2024, the Supreme Court has upheld the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Amended Citizenship Act, 1955,which granted Indian citizenship in furtherance of the Assam Accord, 1985. The Constitution Bench comprising of Chief Justice of India Dr. DY Chandrachud, Justice Surya Kant, Justice M M Sundresh, Justice J B Pardiwala, and Justice […]

 On 17th October,2024, the Supreme Court has upheld the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Amended Citizenship Act, 1955,which granted Indian citizenship in furtherance of the Assam Accord, 1985. The Constitution Bench comprising of Chief Justice of India Dr. DY Chandrachud, Justice Surya Kant, Justice M M Sundresh, Justice J B Pardiwala, and Justice

In a compelling and urgent plea to the Chief Justice of India, Hon'ble Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Senior Advocate, Chairman of the Bar Council of India (BCI) and Member of the Parliament, Mr. Manan Kumar Mishra, has raised serious concerns regarding the treatment of advocates by the judiciary, calling for immediate judicial reforms. His letter,

In a compelling and urgent plea to the Chief Justice of India, Hon'ble Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Senior Advocate, Chairman of the Bar Council of India (BCI) and Member of the Parliament, Mr. Manan Kumar Mishra, has raised serious concerns regarding the treatment of advocates by the judiciary, calling for immediate judicial reforms. His letter,

A fresh plea has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking a directive for the restoration of Jammu and Kashmir's statehood within two months. The petition, brought forth by Zahoor Ahmad Bhat and Khurshaid Ahmad Malik, argues that the delay violates the constitutional principle of federalism. Despite the Supreme Court's 2023 ruling, which upheld the

A fresh plea has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking a directive for the restoration of Jammu and Kashmir's statehood within two months. The petition, brought forth by Zahoor Ahmad Bhat and Khurshaid Ahmad Malik, argues that the delay violates the constitutional principle of federalism. Despite the Supreme Court's 2023 ruling, which upheld the

On September 27, 2024, the Supreme Court bench,  Justice PS Narasimha and Justice Pankaj Mithal, addressed the arbitration dispute and effectively clarified that the appellate court cannot reevaluate the evidence to determine the validity of the arbitral tribunal's award. The background of this case was that the Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation entered into an

On September 27, 2024, the Supreme Court bench,  Justice PS Narasimha and Justice Pankaj Mithal, addressed the arbitration dispute and effectively clarified that the appellate court cannot reevaluate the evidence to determine the validity of the arbitral tribunal's award. The background of this case was that the Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation entered into an

In a significant development, the Supreme Court Constitution Bench comprising Chief Justice Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice B.R. Gavai, Justice J.B. Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj Misra has dismissed a set of review petitions challenging its verdict, which had struck down the 2018 Electoral Bonds Scheme as unconstitutional. The petitions were filed by Matthews

In a significant development, the Supreme Court Constitution Bench comprising Chief Justice Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice B.R. Gavai, Justice J.B. Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj Misra has dismissed a set of review petitions challenging its verdict, which had struck down the 2018 Electoral Bonds Scheme as unconstitutional. The petitions were filed by Matthews