Supreme Court

‘Public Money Misused’; ‘30-Crore Property Sold for Lakhs’—What Is SEBI Doing?’: SC Tears Into Regulators

In a hearing marked by sharp criticism and tough questions, a Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Surya Kant, Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, and Justice N. Kotiswar Singh expressed strong displeasure over the lack of regulatory action in the high-profile case involving Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd., now renamed Sammaan Capital. The matter concerns serious allegations made against

‘Public Money Misused’; ‘30-Crore Property Sold for Lakhs’—What Is SEBI Doing?’: SC Tears Into Regulators Read More »

SC Opens Door To Scrapping ‘Talaq-e-Hasan’: “How Can This Survive In A Civilised Society?”

The Supreme Court recently indicated a possibility of abolishing Talaq-e-Hasan, a Muslim practice where a man can divorce his wife by uttering the word "talaq" once a month for three months. Background: The case arose from a 2022 Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by journalist Benazeer Heena, who challenged Talaq-e-Hasan as unconstitutional, arguing that the

SC Opens Door To Scrapping ‘Talaq-e-Hasan’: “How Can This Survive In A Civilised Society?” Read More »

Roster Mystery In SC: High Voltage Drama As Court Flags Irregular Case Transfer In Lignite Mining Row

A hearing in the Supreme Court, recently, in the dispute involving Rajasthan electricity distribution companies (discoms) and a JSW Group subsidiary took an unusual turn after Senior Advocate Shyam Divan raised concerns over the matter being de-listed from the roster bench without any reasons being provided. Background: The case concerns lignite mining in Rajasthan, operated

Roster Mystery In SC: High Voltage Drama As Court Flags Irregular Case Transfer In Lignite Mining Row Read More »

SC: Wrong Train, Still Right To Compensation—Railways Held Fully Accountable For ‘Baseless’ Defense

In a significant ruling reinforcing passenger rights, the Supreme Court bench of Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice NV Anjaria has directed the Railways to pay a compensation of Rs. 8 lakhs, along with 9% interest, to the parents of a man who lost his life in a railway accident after mistakenly boarding the wrong train.

SC: Wrong Train, Still Right To Compensation—Railways Held Fully Accountable For ‘Baseless’ Defense Read More »

SC Flags Major Flaw In Virtual Trials, Lays Down New Safeguard For Witness Confrontation

In a significant judgment in Raj Kumar @ Bheema v. State of NCT of Delhi, the Supreme Court introduced an important safeguard to make trials fairer when witnesses testify through video conferencing. A bench of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta directed that whenever a witness is examined via video conferencing, the trial court

SC Flags Major Flaw In Virtual Trials, Lays Down New Safeguard For Witness Confrontation Read More »

SC Calls Out ‘Afterthought’ Defences : Overturns NCDRC In Boiler Blast Case

In a notable ruling, the Supreme Court has allowed the insurance claim of a sugar factory whose boiler exploded in 2005, rejecting the insurer’s attempt to deny liability based on defects found only after the incident. A Bench of Justice P.S. Narasimha and Justice Manoj Misra held that insurers cannot avoid paying claims by relying

SC Calls Out ‘Afterthought’ Defences : Overturns NCDRC In Boiler Blast Case Read More »

‘Let Everybody Know’: SC Wants Real-Time Disclosure Of HC Judgment Timelines

The Supreme Court, led by Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, has taken an important step to improve transparency and accountability in the judiciary. The Court suggested that every High Court should set up a public dashboard on its official website showing key judgments timelines, such as the dates of reservation, pronouncement and upload.

‘Let Everybody Know’: SC Wants Real-Time Disclosure Of HC Judgment Timelines Read More »

Clarity on Evidence Act: SC Restricts Handwriting Comparison to Admitted Signatures Only

The Supreme Court recently drew a clear line on when Sections 45 and 73 of the Indian Evidence Act can be invoked, ruling that these provisions which allow expert comparison of handwriting and signatures apply only when the document used for comparison is an admitted one. A bench of Justice M.M. Sundresh and Justice Satish

Clarity on Evidence Act: SC Restricts Handwriting Comparison to Admitted Signatures Only Read More »